White Justice: After the Daniel Penny Acquittal, it’s time to talk about Derek Chauvin again

Posted on 12 December 202412 December 2024 by The Tactical Hermit

After the Daniel Penny acquittal, it’s time to talk about Derek Chauvin again

After the not guilty verdict of Daniel Penny, we think it’s time to talk about Derek Chauvin again.

Derek Chauvin is America’s most infamous “murderer” who didn’t actually commit murder. He was convicted of “killing” George Floyd, despite the fact that many medical experts—including the medical examiner—stated Floyd likely died from a heart attack caused by a drug overdose and underlying health issues.

Many people have good reason to believe that Derek Chauvin did not actually murder George Floyd, and after Penny’s acquittal, they’re speaking out. One of those voices is right-wing influencer and editor of Human Events, Jack Posobiec.

I’ll say it again

Derek Chauvin didn’t murder George Floydpic.twitter.com/EC7UAMRvde

— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 30, 2023

Tucker Carlson also called out this travesty of justice last year.

Derek Chauvin is serving 21 years in prison for a crime he didn’t commit. Someone just tried to murder him. If they’d do this to him, they’d do it to you. pic.twitter.com/jFm4YMOnGK

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) December 28, 2023

However, it’s not just right-wingers saying this—the facts speak for themselves.

RTWT @ Revolver

COPYRIGHT NOTICE/DISCLAIMER & FAIR USE ACT

All blog postings, including all non-fiction and fictional works are copyrighted and considered the sole property of the Tactical Hermit Blog. The names, characters and incidents portrayed in the short stories and novelettes are entirely fictional and are of the author's imagination. Any resemblance to actual events, locales or organizations or persons living or dead is entirely coincidental, The information contained in the articles posted to this site are for informational and/or educational purposes only. The Tactical Hermit disclaims any and all liability resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained herein.

The views and opinions expressed on this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any of the companies that advertise here.

Much of the information on this blog contains copyrighted material whose use has not always been specifically authorized by the rightful copyright owner. This material is made available in an effort to educate and inform and not for remuneration. Under these guidelines this constitutes "Fair Use" under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. The publisher of this site DOES NOT own the copyrights of the images on the site. The copyrights lie with the respective owners.