Skip to content
Menu
  • Original Short Fiction
Menu

Military News: Hands Off! A Cautionary Tale of a .50 BMG Round and a Idiot Named Joe

Posted on 25 March 2016 by The Tactical Hermit

50bmg

EDITOR’S NOTE:  This article first ran back in August of 2014.  As evidenced by the Reservist who recently set off a .50 caliber tracer round by taking a blowtorch to it, it doesn’t look like things have changed much since then.  This article is possibly “not safe for work” due to mild language and an image of a graphic physical injury.


If you’re in the Army, you’ve probably already heard all about Joe.

“Joe” is a term of endearment used to describe Army personnel of both genders and all ranks, but especially the lower enlisted.  The term can be used individually or collectively, but is most often used as a collective term.  “Leaders, take care of Joe.”  “Don’t ever screw with Joe’s pay.” “Joe loves hot chow.”  “You never know what Joe is going to do next.”

Joe is a great guy.  He’s the one that bears the brunt of the fighting, handles the crappiest jobs, and does the majority of bitching about it all.  In short, Joe wins wars.  It has been this way since the beginning of our Army, long before we were all known as G.I. Joes.  Our Army would be nothing without Joe, and his earlier incarnations:  ground pounders, dog-faces, doughboys… the list goes on.

As I said, Joe is great.  Unfortunately, Joe also does some really dumb stuff.

I’ve been in the Army a long time, and I’ve seen Joe do a lot of… interesting things.  Some have been worthy of a simple head-shaking, others required a double face palm.  When I work with the young people who are going to be the future leaders of our Army I explain to them, “One of your primary duties is to help keep Joe from doing dumb shit.”  That always seems to shock them, but it’s 100% true.

Examples of dumb shit might be hooking up with the First Sergeant’s underage daughter, taking out a loan for a five-year-old Mustang at 25% interest, marrying another service member just to get the BAH, …or trying to use a live .50 caliber round as a hammer.  More on that later.

They think they’re getting into junior leaders’ business if they show up in the motor pool, the barracks, or training areas unannounced every once in a while.  Basically, they think that a hands-off approach is best in our modern Army.  They are wrong.In an era of EO, SHARP, extreme political correctness and general liberalization of our Army, leaders these days are too afraid to get into Joe’s business.  They think that they’re being too intrusive or that they are interfering with their Soldiers’ rights if they make spot corrections or engage in hands-on leadership.

Being a hands-off leader briefs well (much like “I‘m an outside the box thinker!”), and makes the individual sound enlightened.  Some Army leaders, particularly officers, use hands-off leadership because they are lazy.  To them, all Soldier issues are “NCO business,” and they know that being involved means they have to tear themselves away from their iPhone and whatever passes for the O Club these days.  Hands off is good because it’s cleaner.  Or so they think.

But being a leader, a real leader, a combat leader, is always messy, and complicated, and time-consuming, because you’re dealing with people.  Dealing with people is always messy, complicated and time-consuming.  It’s also enormously satisfying when done correctly, and is the whole reason we assumed the mantle of leadership in the Army in the first place.  If you don’t want to get your hands dirty with Joe’s business, helping him accomplish the mission, stay out of trouble, and be successful in life, choose another profession outside the military.  Like, maybe the Air Force.

Here’s a little war story involving a literal “hand’s off” incident (you’ll see what I did there shortly) to emphasize the point:

During one of my deployments to Afghanistan, we received a Weapons Safety Message, more commonly known as a “Safetygram.”  Weapons-related Safetygrams can be issued for a number of reasons, but the two most common types I came across were either related to a major weapon malfunction, or were due to what my old First Sergeant used to refer to as “operator headspace and timing.”*

In this particular case, it was the latter.

To sum up what happened, a young Army gunner in another unit was readying his .50 caliber machine gun for combat operations, but was having a hard time getting the pins into the weapon’s mount.  This happens; the weapon is heavy and it’s a bit of a pain sometimes to get everything to line up like it is supposed to.  But without the pins in place, the machinegun would not stay mounted.  That’s kind of a big deal in combat.

Thinking that a little pounding would help, the young troop looked around for the nearest hard object that he could use as a hammer.  Well, this is Afghanistan, so maybe a rock?  That didn’t work.  Hm… what’s something that’s small, hard, that fits in a hand, is strong enough to pound a pin into a gun mount, and that Joe .50 cal gunner is going to have handy?

Well, he’s going to have lots of .50 caliber cartridges.  That’s right, for whatever reason, Joe decided to use a loose .50 cal round as a hammer to pound in the pins to hold his machinegun in place in the turret of his vehicle.

Those of you who understand how modern bullet cartridges work probably already know how this little story is going to end.  For those of you who are not familiar, in general terms the way modern bullets work is that a firing pin strikes a primer on the flat end of the bullet cartridge, which in turn sets off the primer, igniting the propellant, separating the bullet from the cartridge and sending the bullet downrange.  The percussion of a weapon’s firing pin against the primer is what causes it all to happen.

So yeah, you can use a .50 cal round as a hammer, but it’s not a good idea.  Now, if Joe is trying to use a .50 cal round as a hammer, is he going to strike using the tiny pointy end, or the broader, flat end?  Of course he going to use the flat end.  Which in this case Joe did.

And of course the bullet fired.

Read the Remainder at Havok Journal

0 thoughts on “Military News: Hands Off! A Cautionary Tale of a .50 BMG Round and a Idiot Named Joe”

  1. Pingback: Military News: Hands Off! A Cautionary Tale of a .50 BMG Round and a Idiot Named Joe | Rifleman III Journal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tactical Hermit Substack

Recent Post

  • Crime Awareness: Deadly social media ‘door-kicking’ trend could end tragically for kids and homeowners
  • Let Freedom Ring
  • In Memoriam: Michael Madsen
  • The Great Anti-Southern Psyop!
  • Know Your White History: Rudolf Diesel and Clessie Cummins
General Franco (2008-2024)

Book of the Month

Fellow Conspirators

Area Ocho

American Partisan

Western Rifle Shooters Association

Brushbeater

Von Steuben Training and Consulting

CSAT

Politically Incorrect Humor and Memes

Freedom is Just Another Word

Prepared Gun Owners

Fix Bayonets

The Firearm Blog

BorderHawk

Cold Fury

Don Shift SHTF

NC Renegades

Big Country Ex-Pat

The Bayou Renaissance Man

Bustednuckles

The Feral Irishman

It Ain’t Holy Water

Evil White Guy

Pacific Paratrooper

Badlands Fieldcraft

Riskmap

Stuck Pig Medical

Swift Silent Deadly

Spotter Up

The Survival Homestead

Bacon Time!

SHTF Preparedness

Sigma 3 Survival School

The Organic Prepper

The Zombie Apocalypse Survival Homestead

Texas Gun Rights

The Gatalog

Taki’s Magazine

Defensive Training Group

The Trail Up Blood Hill

No White Guilt

Europe Renaissance

Vermont Folk Truth

The Occidental Observer

The Dissident Right

Daily Stormer

American Renaissance

Blacksmith Publishing

Arktos Publishing

Antelope Hill Publishing

White People Press

White Rabbit Radio

White Papers Substack

Viking Life Blog (Archived)

Identity Dixie

The Texian Partisan

Southern Vanguard

League of the South

The Unz Review

Dissident Thoughts

The Third Position

Renegade Tribune

COPYRIGHT NOTICE/DISCLAIMER & FAIR USE ACT

All blog postings, including all non-fiction and fictional works are copyrighted and considered the sole property of the Tactical Hermit Blog. The names, characters and incidents portrayed in the short stories and novelettes are entirely fictional and are of the author's imagination. Any resemblance to actual events, locales or organizations or persons living or dead is entirely coincidental, The information contained in the articles posted to this site are for informational and/or educational purposes only. The Tactical Hermit disclaims any and all liability resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained herein.

The views and opinions expressed on this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any of the companies that advertise here. 

Much of the information on this blog contains copyrighted material whose use has not always been specifically authorized by the rightful copyright owner. This material is made available in an effort to educate and inform and not for remuneration. Under these guidelines this constitutes "Fair Use" under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. The publisher of this site DOES NOT own the copyrights of the images on the site. The copyrights lie with the respective owners.

© 2025 | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme