If we have learned anything from terrorism in the 21st century it is that it is probing and adaptive.
I personally think, if not foiled, this plan would have had moderate success for these idiots, only because, Australia, as a whole, especially in the larger cities, is considered a “restrictive” country when it comes to gun laws. Now transfer this same plan to the United States and I bet most of you out there are saying “Well, if they tried that here, they would have failed….” I say not so fast. Consider the gun laws in America’s major cities..not the rural south, mind you..but the urban north, or worse yet, the United Socialist Republic of Kalifornia , where, by all probability, they might try something like this, only because a muslim in post 9/11 America is able to blend in and disappear much easily in an urban sprawl. Now, if that were the case. I give them the same chances as they had in Australia. Why? Consider the gun laws in New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C., Los Angeles, etc…restrictive? Yeah.
Bottom Line Guys, a neutered and defenseless nation is easier to slaughter…..
Don’t be a Statistic!
Stay Armed, Stay Ready and Stay Dangerous!
Good post. Saw it this am and thought the same thing.
Tactically, for the CHL operator, they want to move you to a secondary location versus ambush kill you right there. This is a “positive” tactically to act decisively, quickly and lethally. Aim ear hole and point of nose for best odds to be on the brain stem geometric plane.