{"id":18016,"date":"2016-07-29T11:33:48","date_gmt":"2016-07-29T16:33:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hcstx.org\/?p=18016"},"modified":"2016-07-29T11:33:48","modified_gmt":"2016-07-29T16:33:48","slug":"military-news-five-u-s-troops-wounded-in-a-stan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/2016\/07\/29\/military-news-five-u-s-troops-wounded-in-a-stan\/","title":{"rendered":"Military News: Five U.S. Troops Wounded in A-Stan"},"content":{"rendered":"

With the Political circus going on, it is easy to forget we still have TROOPS IN CONTACT all over the globe. Do what you can to Help, like becoming a\u00a0Morale Booster<\/a> or sending a nice, fat\u00a0\u00a0Care Package.<\/a>\u00a0-SF<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\"SF\"<\/p>\n

Five U.S. Special Operations troops, fighting alongside\u00a0their Afghan counterparts, were wounded recently\u00a0while battling Islamic State militants in Afghanistan\u2019s Nangahar province, the top U.S. general there said Thursday.<\/p>\n

Speaking to reporters from Kabul, U.S. Army Gen. John W. Nicholson Jr. said that the troops had been wounded from small-arms fire and shrapnel in the past week. He did not specify when exactly the injuries occurred. Two of the service members have already returned to their unit, while the three others had been evacuated out of Afghanistan, though their injuries are\u00a0not life-threatening, Nicholson said.<\/p>\n

He added that the wounded troops are \u201cin good spirits.\u201d<\/p>\n

The troops came under fire during what Nicholson called \u201cclearing operations\u201d as U.S. and Afghan troops pushed into southern Nangahar following a series of\u00a0airstrikes.<\/p>\n

In January, President Obama gave additional authorities to ground commanders in Afghanistan, allowing them to target the growing cell of Islamic State fighters in the country\u2019s east. At the time, their presence was estimated to be around 3,000 fighters, though Nicholson says he believes that number has been cut in half in the past six months\u00a0following Afghan-led offensive operations supported by U.S. troops and airstrikes.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a very dynamic battlefield down there \u2026 but we think we\u2019ve reduced their numbers very significantly,\u201d Nicholson said.<\/p>\n

Nicholson added\u00a0that a majority of the Islamic State fighters in Afghanistan, roughly 70 percent, are former Pakistani Taliban members who\u00a0had joined the Islamic State earlier this year.<\/p>\n

Despite shrinking numbers\u00a0and a loss of\u00a0territory, the Islamic State carried\u00a0out a suicide bombing in Kabul over the weekend that killed more than 80.<\/p>\n

The joint U.S.-Afghan offensive operations against the Islamic State are just one part of a broader 2016 battle plan\u00a0in Afghanistan, Nicholson said, one that involves widespread offensive operations against the Taliban, the Islamic State and other terrorist groups in the country.<\/p>\n

Because of the uptick in operations, Afghan casualties are trending 20 percent higher than they were in 2015, Nicholson said. Additionally, U.S. forces have taken advantage of new authorities granted by Obama that allow for more leeway when it comes to advising and clearing airstrikes to better assist Afghan forces on the offensive. Nicholson said that since Obama approved the new authorities in June, the U.S. coalition in Afghanistan has conducted 40 airstrikes in support of their Afghan allies.<\/p>\n

Read the Original Article at Washington Post<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With the Political circus going on, it is easy to forget we still have TROOPS IN CONTACT all over the globe. Do what you can to Help, like becoming a\u00a0Morale Booster or sending a nice, fat\u00a0\u00a0Care Package.\u00a0-SF Five U.S. Special Operations troops, fighting alongside\u00a0their Afghan counterparts, were wounded recently\u00a0while battling Islamic State militants in Afghanistan\u2019s…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[74,5429,2820],"tags":[13161,13162,2103,3766],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18016"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18016"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18016\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18016"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}