![\"Sun-Tzu-265x300\"](\"https:\/\/hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com\/2016\/06\/sun-tzu-265x300.jpg?w=265\")
<\/h3>\n<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Reprinted from Breitbart.com<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n President Obama is very upset at his critics, who are taking him and his administration to task for refusing to use the term\u00a0\u201cradical Islam\u201d to describe our enemy in the terror war.<\/p>\n During his speech on\u00a0Tuesday, in referring to the term \u201cradical Islam,\u201d the president stated angrily<\/a>:<\/p>\n What exactly would using this label accomplish? What exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less committed to try to kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this? The answer is none of the above. Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n It is interesting to note that our enemy has quite a preoccupation with this very same \u201cpolitical distraction.\u201d<\/p>\n Indeed, back in 2011, Muslim Brotherhood front groups approached the Obama administration<\/a> and demanded to look at the training materials for the FBI and law enforcement agencies to see what words they were using. It\u2019s curious that instead of telling the Brotherhood to go away with the explanation that labels didn\u2019t \u201caccomplish\u201d or \u201cchange\u201d anything, the administration docilely obliged. More curious still, when the Brotherhood returned and demanded that all mention of words connected to Islam, such as \u201cjihad,\u201d \u201cSharia\u201d and \u201cradical Islam,\u201d be purged from the manuals, the administration again docilely obliged.<\/p>\n So we have an intriguing situation: when people who want to protect America implore Obama to use the term \u201cradical Islam\u201d to describe the force waging war on us, he refuses and angrily responds that \u201cdifferent\u201d names don\u2019t make things go away. But when a totalitarian ideology that seeks to destroy our civilization (and boasts that it will do so by our own hands<\/a>) tells us not to use the label \u201cradical Islam\u201d when we were<\/em> doing that, Obama follows the orders.<\/p>\n And so, as author Stephen Coughlin has documented in his work Catastrophic Failure<\/a><\/em>, the Obama administration rooted out all references to jihad and Islam from U.S. intelligence agency manuals. And this action and attitude has affected every realm of government. That\u2019s why in the State Department, for example, an official is not even allowed<\/a> to ask an immigrant about his views on jihad or Sharia law before approving his visa application. In fact, a \u201ccounterterrorism\u201d government guide<\/a> counsels that keeping Muslims out of the country for supporting Sharia law violates the First Amendment.<\/p>\n Such is the devious mentality behind Obama\u2019s \u201cdefense strategy\u201d in the terror war, which demands that American officials and investigators are to consider only violent or criminal conduct<\/em> when trying to keep America safe. Radical ideology is to be ignored, particularly if it has the veneer of \u201creligious expression.\u201d<\/p>\n As a result, when the Muslim Orlando mass murderer, Omar Mateen, verbalized his support for killing unbelievers for the sake of Allah and Islam, it was to be ignored, and the FBI did ignore it<\/a>. That\u2019s why they let him slide. The Bureau didn\u2019t want to break the administration\u2019s rules and let the potential hazard to innocent American lives get in the way of fighting racism and Islamophobia.<\/p>\n And so we come to understand better why, when the Russians had warned the FBI<\/a> about Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and the FBI looked into the brothers, Bureau investigators found nothing<\/a> of concern. It is a bit difficult to find things of concern, you see, when speaking to jihadists entails never mentioning jihad.<\/p>\n And so Tamerlan and Dzhokhar went on to set off their bombs at the Boston Marathon Massacre, killing 3 people (including 8-year-old Martin Richard<\/a>) <\/em>and injuring an estimated 264 on April 15, 2013. And they made it very clear that they did it for the sake of Islam and Allah<\/a>.<\/p>\n But labels don\u2019t matter.<\/p>\n Labels did matter, though, to Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik on December 2, 2015, when they opened fire on Farook\u2019s municipal government workmates at a Christmas party in San Bernardino, California, leaving 14 people dead and 21 wounded. Malik and Farook were inspired<\/a> by the same ideas that the Tsarnaevs were inspired by. Indeed, just before the attack, Malik had been using her social media to announce her love of jihad and to pledge her undying devotion to Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. She was linked to a jihadist mosque in Pakistan. Farook, meanwhile, had made contact with several Muslim terrorist organizations.<\/p>\n But the Americans who were slaughtered by Malik and Farook, in the administration\u2019s view, were clearly a small price to pay for the necessary pursuit of a utopian label-free world. That\u2019s why Malik\u2019s social media proclamations were never discovered before the San Bernardino massacre \u2014 because immigration officials were forbidden<\/em> to review social media as part of their screening process. The Obama administration, through the highest levels of the Department of Homeland Security, explicitly banned<\/a> examination of the social media of immigration applicants. John Cohen, a former acting under-secretary at DHS for intelligence and analysis, explained that this rule was in place<\/a> because of the fear of a \u201ccivil liberties\u201d backlash and \u201cbad public relations\u201d for the Obama administration.<\/p>\n Even more intriguing was how the administration had actually shut down a project that would have most likely led authorities to Farook and Malik and prevented the attack in the first place. Investigator Phil Haney, a former Department of Homeland Security agent, has revealed<\/a> that the government had quashed a surveillance program that he had created to identify global networks that were smuggling Islamists into the United States. The database investigated groups that had ties to Farook and Malik as far back as 2012. But the State Department and the DHS Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties believed that Islamophobia was at play and that the \u201ccivil rights\u201d of the Muslims being monitored were being violated, even though an overwhelming majority of them were not even American citizens. The administration officials accused Haney of profiling Muslims, removed his security clearance and shut down his program, destroying all 67 records of information that he had gathered.One of those records<\/a> included an investigation into an organization with ties to the mosque in Riverside, Calif., that Farook had attended.<\/p>\n