{"id":15624,"date":"2016-05-26T13:00:23","date_gmt":"2016-05-26T18:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hcstx.org\/?p=15624"},"modified":"2016-05-26T13:00:23","modified_gmt":"2016-05-26T18:00:23","slug":"military-weapons-from-the-past-the-emc-49-smg-was-too-futuristic-for-the-british-army","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/2016\/05\/26\/military-weapons-from-the-past-the-emc-49-smg-was-too-futuristic-for-the-british-army\/","title":{"rendered":"Military Weapons From The Past: The EMC-49 SMG Was Too Futuristic For The British Army"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-15625\" src=\"https:\/\/hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com\/2016\/05\/emc49.png?w=620\" alt=\"EMC49\" width=\"620\" height=\"177\" \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"319a\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">Following the end of <a class=\"markup--anchor markup--p-anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/historicalfirearms.tumblr.com\/tagged\/WWII\">World War II<\/a>, the British Army sought a replacement for the <a class=\"markup--anchor markup--p-anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/historicalfirearms.tumblr.com\/tagged\/sten\">STEN Gun<\/a> which had been the British military\u2019s workhorse submachine gun since 1940.<\/p>\n<p id=\"7d01\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">The Army did <em class=\"markup--em markup--p-em\">not <\/em>choose the futuristic Experimental Machine Carbine, 1949 from BSA. But maybe it should have.<\/p>\n<p id=\"384f\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--figure\">The STEN was simple, cheap and arguably nasty. While the STEN was the perfect <em class=\"markup--em markup--p-em\">wartime<\/em> submachine gun, the Army requested a more refined and durable design.<\/p>\n<p id=\"da94\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">Ultimately, the Army chose Sterling Armaments Company\u2019s Patchett M1944<em class=\"markup--em markup--p-em\">,<\/em>later known simply as \u201cthe Sterling.\u201d Before selecting the Sterling, the Army considered the <a class=\"markup--anchor markup--p-anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/historicalfirearms.tumblr.com\/tagged\/welgun\">Welgun<\/a>\u200a\u2014\u200awhich BSA had developed during the war\u200a\u2014\u200aas well as a new design from Enfield.<\/p>\n<p id=\"22df\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">BSA\u2019s Experimental Machine Carbine, 1949 was another failed contender. Chambered in the same ubiquitous nine-millimeter cartridge as the <a class=\"markup--anchor markup--p-anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/historicalfirearms.tumblr.com\/tagged\/sten\">STEN<\/a>was, the EMC also had the same side-mounted 32-round box magazine that characterized the STEN and, later, the Sterling.<\/p>\n<p id=\"92e0\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">The Experimental Carbine used the standard blowback action as rival guns but cycled at 600 rounds per minute, faster than the Sterling and all of the earlier <a class=\"markup--anchor markup--p-anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/historicalfirearms.tumblr.com\/post\/47808163617\/evolution-of-the-sten-gun-the-stens-design\">STEN variants<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p id=\"8fec\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--figure\">It had a number of interesting features, including a bakelite plastic foregrip that had a similar profile to the <a class=\"markup--anchor markup--p-anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/historicalfirearms.tumblr.com\/tagged\/.280-british\">EM series\u2019<\/a> foregrip. It also had an ingenious hinged magazine-housing that could pivot backward to clear jams, without the user having to remove the magazine. The same feature also facilitated cleaning.<\/p>\n<p id=\"963a\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">The EMC also boasted an easy-to-operate safety switch integrated into the grip.<\/p>\n<p id=\"3ee4\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">Interestingly, the weapon lacked a bolt handle. Instead, the shooter cockedthe EMC by pushing the foregrip forward and then pulling it back. This pushed a bar which in turn pushed the bolt back and cocked the weapon. The user then slightly rotated the grip in order to disengage the bar and allow the bolt to cycle once fired.<\/p>\n<p id=\"a0c7\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--mixtapeEmbed\">In response to criticisms of the <a class=\"markup--anchor markup--p-anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/historicalfirearms.tumblr.com\/tagged\/welgun\">Welgun\u2019s<\/a> open receiver, BSA entirely enclosed the EMC, leaving only the magazine well and ejection port open\u200a\u2014\u200aand the latter only when firing.<\/p>\n<p id=\"2d15\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">Regardless of the EMC\u2019s innovative features, the Army passed over the design in favor of the Sterling submachine gun, which entered service in 1953.<\/p>\n<p id=\"d3a9\" class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\"><a class=\"markup--anchor markup--p-anchor\" href=\"http:\/\/www.historicalfirearms.info\/post\/144875740047\/historicalfirearms-bsa-experimental-machine\"><em class=\"markup--em markup--p-em\">This story originally appeared at Historical Firearms.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"graf--p graf-after--p\">Read the Original Article as Seen Here at <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/warisboring.com\/the-british-army-didnt-want-this-futuristic-submachine-gun-4cc3efc64d1?mc_cid=34cfc512ba&amp;mc_eid=1149a36069#.mzg1d6tk1\">War is Boring<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following the end of World War II, the British Army sought a replacement for the STEN Gun which had been the British military\u2019s workhorse submachine gun since 1940. The Army did not choose the futuristic Experimental Machine Carbine, 1949 from BSA. But maybe it should have. The STEN was simple, cheap and arguably nasty. While&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[4827,6446,24],"tags":[11887,360,11888,3913,11889,11890],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15624"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15624"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15624\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}