{"id":13727,"date":"2016-03-27T11:09:01","date_gmt":"2016-03-27T16:09:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hcstx.org\/?p=13727"},"modified":"2016-03-27T11:09:01","modified_gmt":"2016-03-27T16:09:01","slug":"cold-war-files-how-the-cia-covertly-used-modern-art-as-a-weapon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/2016\/03\/27\/cold-war-files-how-the-cia-covertly-used-modern-art-as-a-weapon\/","title":{"rendered":"Cold War Files: How the CIA Covertly Used Modern Art as A Weapon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-13728\" src=\"https:\/\/hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com\/2016\/03\/modart.jpg?w=231\" alt=\"modart\" width=\"231\" height=\"300\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>For decades in art circles it was either a rumour or a joke, but now it is confirmed as a fact. The Central Intelligence Agency used American modern art \u2013 including the works of such artists as Jackson Pollock, Robert Motherwell, Willem de Kooning and Mark Rothko \u2013 as a weapon in the Cold War. In the manner of a Renaissance prince \u2013 except that it acted secretly \u2013 the CIA fostered and promoted American Abstract Expressionist painting around the world for more than 20 years.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Because Abstract Expressionism was expensive to move around and exhibit, millionaires and museums were called into play. Pre-eminent among these was Nelson Rockefeller, whose mother had co-founded the Museum of Modern Art in New York. As president of what he called \u201cMummy\u2019s museum\u201d, Rockefeller was one of the biggest backers of Abstract Expressionism (which he called \u201cfree enterprise painting\u201d). His museum was contracted to the Congress for Cultural Freedom to organise and curate most of its important art shows.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>The museum was also linked to the CIA by several other bridges. William Paley, the president of CBS broadcasting and a founding father of the CIA, sat on the members\u2019 board of the museum\u2019s International Program. John Hay Whitney, who had served in the agency\u2019s wartime predecessor, the OSS, was its chairman. And Tom Braden, first chief of the CIA\u2019s International Organisations Division, was executive secretary of the museum in 1949.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2013 From the excellent <em>Independent<\/em> article published in\u00a01995:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html\">Modern Art Was CIA \u2018Weapon\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Most of you will be aware of the oligarch bidding wars for\u00a0high end art\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2015-05-14\/these-10-pieces-of-art-just-sold-for-almost-800-million\">at recent\u00a0auctions held by Christie\u2019s and Sotheby\u2019s<\/a>. In fact, the feeding frenzy was so extreme, the\u00a0top 10 lots accounted for almost\u00a0$800 million alone. Some of these paintings are breathtakingly beautiful, such as\u00a0Vincent Van Gogh\u2019s, \u201cL\u2019All\u00e9e des Alyscamps.\u201d Others, not so much. Such as this one by Mark Rothko, which sold for $46.5 million.<\/p>\n<p>Unsurprisingly, the paintings which seem to be least inspiring were by artists who were covertly pushed by the CIA in the 1950\u2019s as part of its cold war strategy. Mark Rothko, for example, was born in the Russian Empire in 1903 (modern day Latvia) and ended up in America in 1913. Being a Russian artist in America made him the perfect CIA tool, and apparently his art served that purpose unbeknownst to him. The CIA program was originally set up in 1947, under the not so covert division called the <em>Propaganda Assets Inventory. <\/em>You\u00a0really can\u2019t make this up.<\/p>\n<div class=\"widget storyContent article widget-editable viziwyg-section-1024 inpage-widget-8939454 articleContent\">\n<p>In one of the most interesting articles I\u2019ve ever read, we learn from the <em>UK Independent<\/em> in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html\">a 1995 article<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>For decades in art circles it was either a rumour or a joke, but now it is confirmed as a fact. The Central Intelligence Agency used American modern art \u2013 including the works of such artists as Jackson Pollock, Robert Motherwell, Willem de Kooning and Mark Rothko \u2013 as a weapon in the Cold War. In the manner of a Renaissance prince \u2013 except that it acted secretly \u2013 the CIA fostered and promoted American Abstract Expressionist painting around the world for more than 20 years.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The connection is improbable. This was a period, in the 1950s and 1960s, when the great majority of Americans disliked or even despised modern art \u2013 President Truman summed up the popular view when he said: \u201cIf that\u2019s art, then I\u2019m a Hottentot.\u201d As for the artists themselves, many were ex- communists barely acceptable in the America of the McCarthyite era, and certainly not the sort of people normally likely to receive US government backing.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Why did the CIA support them? Because in the propaganda war with the Soviet Union, this new artistic movement could be held up as proof of the creativity, the intellectual freedom, and the cultural power of the US. Russian art, strapped into the communist ideological straitjacket, could not compete.<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Read the Remainder at <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/libertyblitzkrieg.com\/2015\/05\/14\/before-you-buy-that-rothko-how-the-cia-covertly-nurtured-modern-art-as-a-cold-war-weapon\/\">Liberty Blitzkrieg<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For decades in art circles it was either a rumour or a joke, but now it is confirmed as a fact. The Central Intelligence Agency used American modern art \u2013 including the works of such artists as Jackson Pollock, Robert Motherwell, Willem de Kooning and Mark Rothko \u2013 as a weapon in the Cold War&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[2770,2908,5525,475,1725,2967,4880,10],"tags":[10651,10652],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13727"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13727\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetacticalhermit.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}