Future Warfare: Three Articles You Need to Read on Russia and China

hands-triangle

I have felt a strong need as of late to stay abreast of all developments regarding Russia and China.

I would urge all my readers to not be distracted by all the Political theater and “filler” the state run media seems intent on running on continuous loop as of late. It is mindless garbage fit for the “Useful Idiots”, which I dare say my readers ARE NOT!!

The Civilian Operator must always remember that the KEY to both keeping themselves and their family safe and being able to adequately PREPARE for any serious threat is GOOD INTELLIGENCE.

I would normally re-post these articles separately, but because of their length, I thought it more pertinent to just link them.

 

CHINA RESTRUCTURING FOR WAR

CHINA CLOSING THE INNOVATION GAP

A NEW BIG THREE?

 

Stay Alert, Stay Informed, Stay Armed and Stay Dangerous!

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Future Warfare: Three Articles You Need to Read on Russia and China

  1. Pingback: Future Warfare: Three Articles You Need to Read on Russia and China — Hammerhead Combat Systems | The Missal

  2. Gap — How quickly Americans have forgotten!
    “We would do well to remember that the last time that the U.S. confronted China directly in armed conflict was the Korean War. When the U.S., using the UN as cover, advanced all the way to the border with China, the Yalu river, China entered the war and the U.S. was driven back south to the 38th parallel. The result was restoration of the status quo ante bellum, with Korea divided in the way it remains to this day. At that time China was weak and backward; now it is strong and advanced.”

  3. War — the maps tell so much. I pay attention to the Phillipines as I have family and friends there.
    “Chinese leader Xi Jinping has told the PLA to prepare to “fight and win” battles, and the Pentagon said the slogan is an indication Chinese leaders are concerned the military, which has not fought a war in more than 30 years, may not fare well in modern combat.”

Comments are closed.